2019年5月11日 星期六

政一B 邱科翰 (2-11)

姓名 : 邱科翰
班級 : 政一B
學號 : 07114248

[標題] Battle for the fate of the Iran nuclear deal begins

[內文] The real battle for the fate of the Iran nuclear deal has begun.
For a year now since the Trump administration unilaterally withdrew from the agreement, a kind of "phoney diplomatic war" has been under way.
Iran and all the other parties to the accord have carried on regardless of Washington's actions.
Indeed, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the global nuclear watchdog, has repeatedly given Tehran a clean bill of health. Iran has been living up to its part of the bargain.
But Iranian compliance was not the issue for the Trump administration.
It just believes that this is a very bad deal. Its main European allies, along with Russia and China, disagree.
So the Trump administration has been ratcheting up the pressure on Tehran.
It has re-imposed many sanctions; it has designated the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organisation; and, most recently, it has not renewed sanctions waivers that allowed several countries to continue purchasing Iranian oil.
The pressure on Iran's economy has been severe.
Both in terms of responding to popular pressure at home and in an effort to relieve its worsening situation, the Iranian government has now decided to act.
It has taken the first anniversary of the US withdrawal from the agreement - known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) - to start setting conditions of its own.
Iran is pursuing what it sees as a deliberate and measured course.
First, it says it is no longer going to respect restrictions on storing enriched uranium and heavy water.
And it has given a 60-day deadline to the remaining countries involved in the JCPOA to implement what Iran calls "their commitments", particularly in the banking and oil sectors.
If this deadline passes, then Iran will suspend restrictions on the level of enrichment it is allowed to conduct and halt the modernisation of the Arak heavy-water reactor.
Iran is presenting itself very much as the wronged party, forced to act by unrelenting US pressure. And, if you ignore wider concerns about Iran's regional behaviour or its missile programmes - which, to be fair were never part of the JCPOA - it has a point.
It has broadly stuck to the letter of the agreement. US sanctions that were supposed to be lifted have been reimposed. Its economy is suffering badly. Tehran is saying "enough is enough".
The pressure now is squarely upon the Europeans - in particular the French, the British and German governments which helped to negotiate the deal.
Iran is charging them with not having lived up to their promises.
They have to do something to relieve the economic pressure on Tehran or, after 60 days, it will move to stage two of its planned suspensions.
And there is an explicit warning to the Europeans too.
Iran's President, Hassan Rouhani, has underlined his country's role in fighting the smuggling of drugs and in constraining the flow of refugees into Europe. US economic pressure, he insists, means that Iran could no longer afford such activities.
So what can the Europeans do?
They have created an elaborate mechanism to facilitate trade with Iran. But it is unclear how effective this has been.
Many companies with an international profile would prefer to avoid the risks and choose trade with the US over Iran.
European governments are in a double-bind.
Relations with Washington have already been soured by this issue. The US wants the JCPOA gone and it is hard to see how the Europeans can do enough by themselves to satisfy Iran to save it.
But equally the Europeans, in wanting the nuclear deal to survive, cannot allow Iran to remain in breach of its terms.
So a difficult couple of months of diplomacy lie ahead.
Unless there is a fudge, it is hard to see the JCPOA surviving.
The Europeans need to craft some modest understanding that gives Tehran the opportunity to back down and return to full compliance. It cannot be only partly in the JCPOA deal. Washington's unilateral rejection of it at least had the benefit of clarity.
Russia and China were also key backers of the JCPOA.
They too have a diplomatic part to play, but Washington's position is inevitably causing additional tensions with Moscow and Beijing. Both governments have laid the blame for the JCPOA's problems squarely at Washington's door.
The Trump administration must see its ultimate goal - the collapse of the JCPOA - as now being in sight.
It will also be applying huge pressure on its European partners who are caught between a rock and a hard place.
The Europeans are to some extent ambivalent because they too are concerned about Iran's foreign policy, its support for terrorism, and its missile and missile-export programmes.
This is the context in which tensions are rising.
US military warnings are intended to send an unequivocal message that any anti-US actions by Iran or its proxies will have only one return address - Tehran.
Is Washington gearing up for a war? Not yet.
But the logic of the Trump administration's policy is unforgiving - either Iran radically changes its behaviour, or the US will do as much as it can to bring the Iranian regime down.
The danger of conflict - albeit by accident rather than design - is growing.
And the collapse of the JCPOA will be another step on the escalatory ladder


[相關憲法條文]
憲法第 141 : 中華民國之外交,應本獨立自主之精神,平等互惠之原則,敦睦邦交,尊重條約及聯合國憲章,以保護僑民權益,促進國際合作,提倡國際正義,確保世界和平。
憲法第 142 : 國民經濟應以民生主義為基本原則,實施平均地權,節制資本,以謀國計民生之均足。
憲法第 144 : 公用事業及其他有獨佔性之企業,以公營為原則,其經法律許可者,得由國民經營之。
憲法第 145 : 國家對於私人財富及私營事業,認為有妨害國計民生之平衡發展者,應以
法律限制之。
合作事業應受國家之獎勵與扶助。
國民生產事業及對外貿易,應受國家之獎勵、指導及保護。

[相關法條]
台灣中油股份有限公司公司章程第二條 : 本公司所營事業如下︰
一、C803011石油煉製業。
二、D201011公用煤氣業。
三、F212011加油站業。
四、F212021漁船加油站業。
五、F401151石油輸入業。
六、G901011第一類電信事業。
七、F212061加氣站業。
八、EZ01011地下水鑿井業。
九、ZZ99999除許可業務外,得經營法令非禁止或限制之業務。


心得評論:
Why is Taiwan even related to this news ? One might wonder. Taiwan is but a tiny island in the face P5+1, which included three of the four largest economies, and five of the “nuclear eight”. The reason ? Taiwan was one of the eight states that still purchase Iranian oil. Since US President Donald Trump announced sanctions last year, Taiwan was given a due to reduce purchase of Iranian exports or face US sanctions. And because Taiwan cannot risk going against the United States, the petroleum companies of Taiwan has halted all oil imports from Iran. It’s surprising that Taiwan was even trading with a known terrorist state, which might indirectly fund illegal projects or contribute to regional instability. Shame. But it’s better late than never. 

Back to the topic, and it is evident the JCPOA is falling apart. Personally, I felt sorry for the Europeans. While I give credit to Washington for trying to tackle ballistic missile-related topics and suppress Iran’s ambitions in the region, pulling out of the JCPOA is the worst way possible. And this is the root of all troubles for the Europeans. They wish to contain Iran’s influence in the region, along with terrorism and illegal immigrants and substances, but cannot risk going against the US, or abandoning the JCPOA. The only “good” news here is that the Russians and the Chinese both support the JCPOA, so there might still be some hope.  

沒有留言:

張貼留言